Archive interactive marketing

Integrated Digital Marketing

There was a time, 15 – 20 years ago or more, when media plans consisted of distinct media, each with a life of its own. The only connection they had was their relative impact on TRPs, reach and frequency. If there was one media that appeared to be too expensive, you simple asked where you could make up the TRPs. Perhaps this is a bit of a simplification, but not much. The challenge in today’s environment is that, too often, digital media is viewed through a very similar lens.

When planning digital media, there is a disconnect between the channels. Search budgets are allocated irrespective of display, email is treated independent of social (if there is a social component) and offline activities are seldom weighed when planning online efforts. What the traditional planning process misses is the inherent integration of all these aspects, whether it is intended and managed, or not. It goes beyond leveraging synergies. By ‘disconnecting’ these channels, you run the real risk of undermining their inherent value.

Not too long ago, there was an argument that leveraging the synergies of the digital channels was the sole purview of the national advertiser. With the advances in our understanding of consumers, and the capabilities of technology, this is no longer the case. Consumers are fine-tuning their own experiences on the web and mobile to target localized content. Between geo targeted ad delivery on the internet, re-marketing technology, and GPS enabled mobile devises, local businesses have as much at stake, and opportunity, with integration as do the national advertisers; perhaps more. With each channel, such as display, social or mobile, we can see the connections between channels.

The fact is, people don’t often click on display ads. But, it would be a mistake to assume that this means display is not effective. People who are exposed to display ads, will search for the company or product in the search engines, or type the company website into their browser. In fact, according to a ComScore study there is a 45.7% lift in site visits as a result of exposure to display ads over a 4 week period. If you are not managing your search campaign in synergy with display, you’ll not only miss opportunities, but you’ll also make false attributions.  Your search campaign needs to highlight keywords, ad copy and landing pages that are directly related to the display ads. One of the most dangerous pitfalls in online advertising is creating experiences that diverge from consumer expectations. If your display ads set up expectations that are not experienced through your search, you’ll lose the customer. Unfortunately, when not integrating the two, you’re likely to assume the search campaign stumbled; not seeing the connection to the display program that initiated the search in the first place. By planning from an integrated approach, you’ll leverage the synergies and minimize the mistakes.

Social networks are growing and many consumers see this as the primary mode of communicating online. According to Nielsen, the average user of social media has increased their time in the space by 143%. In total, Americans are spending 210% more time on social networks than a year ago. Email, offline, and even online display advertising can all leverage the power of social media by providing customers with an easy way to become a fan or a follower. Of course, you’ll need to give people a reason. For small businesses, using the social networks can drive customers to the store, running time sensitive offers; Inventory can be move with very targeted messaging; create unique content messaging to niche areas of your customer base. One click from an email, or a display ad, or visit driven by in-store POS can be the start of long relationship with customers. But, it can only happen if you seen the connections between the different media.

Every year it seems like we have more reasons to believe we live in a world of change. Over 2009 and moving quickly into 2010, mobile has exerted itself as a true medium for non-phone two way digital communication. Google is aggressively pushing forward with integrating online and mobile experiences so users can research at their desktop and have the same information available on their mobile. While display advertising is still nascent, location based searches are growing strong. So, you have to managed your location information online. If you don’t, users can easily receive old or even entirely wrong information about your business. Understanding how your address and phone number are managed online is key to developing successful mobile experiences – the two are very connected. Search marketing has also evolved to present click-to-call phone numbers as well as URL. Facebook and twitter have mobile services that let people take the social network with them wherever they are. On the mobile platform, we are seeing the convergence of location information, search, social and display advertising. If you don’t manage the integration of your digital advertising, consumers could very easily have 3, 4 or even more very different experiences with your business, all on the same 3 inch screen.

Integration, and targeted advertising, are available to businesses of every size. I’ve only highlighted a few examples of the inter-connectedness of digital advertising. All are within the control of small and medium size businesses. Whether you take the reins directly, or have an agency handle the heavy lifting for you, make 2010 the year you decide to integrate your digital marketing efforts.

Brand building & leveraging 2

A couple of weeks ago I wrote about the distinction between building a brand and leveraging it. In short, building is what you do up to the time the consumer is ready to buy, while leveraging it is what you do when you are pulling all the pieces together to close the sale. The point was / is, that building or leveraging the brand is not about the media, marketers, brand managers or agencies. It is about the consumer and where are they in the shopping process.

This discussion most often comes into play around search and the branded keywords. Too often, marketers focus in the medium, or in this case, the branded keyword. I believe this media-centric dialogue misses the point and mentioned that broadening the perspective goes beyond search:

“While this conversation regularly comes up in search, the same discussion needs to happen around display. Geo-targeting, behavioral targeting and other user profiling capabilities allow us to learn about consumer intent. As they visit sites, they may indicate that it is no longer time to tell them about Honda’s great quality, but instead focus on the great gas mileage of the Civic, or even the service and quality of a specific dealer. We have to be more open to the intent in order to provide the consumer with the right information.”

A piece in Media Post’s Behavioral Insider by Steve Smith discusses how Teracent is helping HP target the message based on consumer’s online, and off-site behavior. Chip Hall, Sr VP at Teracent, discusses the changes in messaging base on real-time data and the progression of message targeting from the very broad when data is scarce, to very targeted when there is more data upon which to base the targeting decisions. It is all consumer, not media, centric.

At no time does this suggest that we ignore brand. It is always part of the equation. But this is how it plays into the message evolution as we learn about the consumer. BT is still rather young. But, its premiss is focussed on what the consumer wants to hear and see given their place in the buying process and not on a binary decision of “this is a branding vehicle and this one is not”. Two consumers can get two different messages from the same display space (or anywhere) from the same advertiser. The focus of the message, pure brand or focussed on attributes, will depend on what you know about the consumer at that moment.
Photo

steve haar

April 14th

behavioral

branding

interactive marketing

The right perspective makes all the difference

This is an easy putt:


I have always promoted the idea that search marketers have to step beyond search to see what is really going in with their company or clients. To really add value, you have to know where you fit in, what obstacles you might face and what you might offer beyond the obvious. Sometimes, even often, the obstacles have nothing to do with the game of search. Take another look at that easy put… from a broader perspective. 


  
Kind of makes you rethink it, doesn’t it? If you are only focusing on your narrow area, are there dangers, threats, or perhaps opportunities that you are missing?
Photo

steve haar

December 9th

interactive marketing

perspective

Ostriches beware, being an expert in search is no longer enough.

You know there has always been a connection between search and display advertising results. However, if you talk to the AOL rep, they only know one medium. Ditto with Yahoo!. Throw Ask in there as well. They all have vast display ad opportunities, decent search products (AOL launched Search Market Place – a white label of Ad Words), yet despite much research, including some of their own to support integration, they silo the respective media categories.

Finally, Yahoo is brining them under one roof. Their announcement a couple of weeks ago is a welcome step. In time, our service team will have better access to the display side of the house.  Currently, we deal with different people to buy display and search. There is no connection in the programs internally. This presents a strong disconnect on the side of Yahoo! with our programs. But, this should iron itself out with the new structure.

There is a huge benefit in the self-service search tools, backed by support of the account service team. In addition to a better coordinated program through integrated account teams, I have no doubt that they will adapt the same tool set for managing display programs. This is just one indication that the major players are taking search and display integration seriously.

Some would point to Google as an example of tools already integrated.  However, this is only part of the equation. What gives the others a leg up is the control of and ability to integrate the display and search programs at a strategic level as well as a tactical or tool based level. Google is fine if you just want to throw display ads out to a network, or target some particular sites. But, in their model, no one at Google is an expert in the content sites themselves.

AOL, Yahoo, MSN and (if they care to exploit it) Ask all have the expertise in the content development, user experience and user tracking that can be leveraged in the integration of search and display advertising. A couple of months ago, I mentioned AOL’s search back. This product allows you to target those who searched on a particular keyword (custom), or category of keywords (standard) even if they did not click on your ad. Yahoo has a beta that they closed for further modification that can do very similar targeting. This is the most obvious application of integrated search and display advertising.

Beyond this, they can see the surfing habits of users tracked backwards from specific events, like a particular search. In this, they can develop targeted display based on likelihood to conduct particular category searches. In a longer purchase process, they can target display ads to areas where users tend to go post search on category terms. With the proper modeling, they can utilize their content display programs to target those who were likely to have done a category search on someone else’s search engine.

The bottom line, search and display integration are finally getting a serious look from some of the major companies that have and control both. As search marketers, we need to expand and become familiar with both as well. For years, we have behaved as if search is it’s own little island, acknowledging external impacts, but never really planning with them. That world is over. To continue to be cutting edge search marketers, we now have to understand and be able to work with the display side in a strategic way, if not actually become the display side.

line
September 2010
M T W T F S S
« Aug    
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930